Resumen
Objective: to highlight the importance of the Petro vs. Colombia judgment, since it is the first that orders the Colombian State to modify its legal system. Methodology: a descriptive analytical. Results: this will be the most difficult sentence to comply with for Colombia, since some allege that it violates its sovereignty, but others consider that it is an opportunity to adapt our regulatory order to conventional parameters in relation to the competence of the Office of the Attorney General of the Nation to remove and disqualify officials elected by popular vote. Contributions: the research has as contribution the discussion of a judgment to be enforced in Colombia by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
Título traducido de la contribución | JUDGMENT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE PETRO URREGO CASE: THE MOST DIFFICULT ORDER FOR COLOMBIA TO COMPLY WITH |
---|---|
Idioma original | Español |
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 463-507 |
Número de páginas | 45 |
Publicación | Revista Juridica |
Volumen | 3 |
N.º | 70 |
DOI | |
Estado | Publicada - 1 jul. 2022 |
Palabras clave
- control of constitutionality
- control of conventionality
- inter-American declaration of human rights
- Inter-American Human Rights System
- political rights