TY - GEN
T1 - How management efforts of a large hydropower firm impact sustainability in the Colombian Andes
T2 - 6th International Conference on Water and Society, WS 2021
AU - Cortés-Borda, Daniel
AU - Polanco, Jorge Andrés
AU - Escobar-Sierra, Manuela
N1 - Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge Josep-Maria Mateo Sanz, from the Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain, who provided support in the preliminary statistical analysis. The authors would like to thank to the Colombian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (Minciencias) for the funding 80740-663-2020.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 WIT Press.
PY - 2021/7/28
Y1 - 2021/7/28
N2 - When it comes to sustainability, watersheds and hydropower firms must be conceived as a whole. Namely, hydropower dams impact the three dimensions of sustainability of watersheds, while dams’ lifetime is lowered by unsustainable practices taking place in the watersheds. Management of hydropower firms aiming at sustainability might ensure the long-term use of dams without compromising ecosystems and society’s welfare. We aim to assess the impact of management efforts of a large hydropower firm on the sustainability of the influenced watersheds from the perceptions of society. We build on survey data assessing the social perception of the impacts caused by a large hydropower plants operation; and the firm’s management efforts aiming at sustainability. To this end, we perform a stepwise multilinear regression of ad-hoc impact management indices (independent variables) and impact indices (dependent variables). Data comprises more than 600 surveys from community, policymakers and industry, from two watersheds in Colombian Andes. Results revealed a positive correlation between all the impact indices and the management indices concerning environment and economy-society. The remaining management indices showed no (or low) correlation with impacts. Findings suggest that, despite firm’s sustainability awareness, society perceives low positive impact in due to (what they consider) firm’s few impact management efforts in environmental indices (i.e., erosion and deforestation) and socio-economic indices (i.e., income alternatives in agriculture, fisheries and tourism activities). Other efforts are not perceived as (positive or negative) consequences of the impact. Correlation results provided valuable information, for scholars and practitioners, on the interaction of dams and watersheds. On one hand, the theoretical implications showed how a holistic approach of sustainability is needed to better understand the complexity of this relationship. On the other, the management implications gave insights on how a large hydropower plant can operate in the long term while causing a positive impact on ecosystems and the local society.
AB - When it comes to sustainability, watersheds and hydropower firms must be conceived as a whole. Namely, hydropower dams impact the three dimensions of sustainability of watersheds, while dams’ lifetime is lowered by unsustainable practices taking place in the watersheds. Management of hydropower firms aiming at sustainability might ensure the long-term use of dams without compromising ecosystems and society’s welfare. We aim to assess the impact of management efforts of a large hydropower firm on the sustainability of the influenced watersheds from the perceptions of society. We build on survey data assessing the social perception of the impacts caused by a large hydropower plants operation; and the firm’s management efforts aiming at sustainability. To this end, we perform a stepwise multilinear regression of ad-hoc impact management indices (independent variables) and impact indices (dependent variables). Data comprises more than 600 surveys from community, policymakers and industry, from two watersheds in Colombian Andes. Results revealed a positive correlation between all the impact indices and the management indices concerning environment and economy-society. The remaining management indices showed no (or low) correlation with impacts. Findings suggest that, despite firm’s sustainability awareness, society perceives low positive impact in due to (what they consider) firm’s few impact management efforts in environmental indices (i.e., erosion and deforestation) and socio-economic indices (i.e., income alternatives in agriculture, fisheries and tourism activities). Other efforts are not perceived as (positive or negative) consequences of the impact. Correlation results provided valuable information, for scholars and practitioners, on the interaction of dams and watersheds. On one hand, the theoretical implications showed how a holistic approach of sustainability is needed to better understand the complexity of this relationship. On the other, the management implications gave insights on how a large hydropower plant can operate in the long term while causing a positive impact on ecosystems and the local society.
KW - Environmental impact
KW - Hydropower
KW - Social impact
KW - Social perception
KW - Stepwise regression
KW - Sustainability
KW - Watershed
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112186307&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2495/WS210031
DO - 10.2495/WS210031
M3 - Contribución a la conferencia
AN - SCOPUS:85112186307
VL - 251
SP - 23
EP - 35
BT - Water and Society VI
PB - WITPress
Y2 - 19 May 2021 through 21 May 2021
ER -