TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessments under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
T2 - A Bibliometric Analysis
AU - Londoño-Pineda, Abraham Allec
AU - Cano, Jose Alejandro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Abraham Allec Londoño-Pineda et al., published by Sciendo.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - The United Nations announced its 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development worldwide in 2015. Comprehensive assessments of member states' performance towards achieving the related UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have since become a major challenge for national and subnational governments. This article presents a bibliometric analysis on the assessment of SDGs, at both the general and specific levels, based on 418 publications obtained from Scopus. The general level of analysis includes the number, types, and subject areas of documents published each year, as well as considerations such as the most-cited publications and the leading authors, journals, countries, institutional affiliations, and funders. The specific level of analysis includes a study of the relevant concepts in the publications and their relationships, allowing for the identification of predominant assessments under the 2030 Agenda, and of the most-often evaluated SDGs. Results indicated a focus on measuring impacts and risks, with SDGs 3, 6, 13, 7, 8, and 4 having been assessed the most often among the 17 SDGs, which is consistent with findings in prevalent subject areas such as environmental sciences, social sciences, medicine, and energy. Future works should address assessments under the 2030 Agenda more comprehensively, including analyses on trade-offs among the SDGs and on the transversal nature of some of these goals.
AB - The United Nations announced its 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development worldwide in 2015. Comprehensive assessments of member states' performance towards achieving the related UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have since become a major challenge for national and subnational governments. This article presents a bibliometric analysis on the assessment of SDGs, at both the general and specific levels, based on 418 publications obtained from Scopus. The general level of analysis includes the number, types, and subject areas of documents published each year, as well as considerations such as the most-cited publications and the leading authors, journals, countries, institutional affiliations, and funders. The specific level of analysis includes a study of the relevant concepts in the publications and their relationships, allowing for the identification of predominant assessments under the 2030 Agenda, and of the most-often evaluated SDGs. Results indicated a focus on measuring impacts and risks, with SDGs 3, 6, 13, 7, 8, and 4 having been assessed the most often among the 17 SDGs, which is consistent with findings in prevalent subject areas such as environmental sciences, social sciences, medicine, and energy. Future works should address assessments under the 2030 Agenda more comprehensively, including analyses on trade-offs among the SDGs and on the transversal nature of some of these goals.
KW - 2030 agenda
KW - Appraisal
KW - assessment
KW - evaluation
KW - sustainable development goals
KW - United Nations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127928897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2478/rtuect-2022-0014
DO - 10.2478/rtuect-2022-0014
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85127928897
SN - 2255-8837
VL - 26
SP - 166
EP - 181
JO - Environmental and Climate Technologies
JF - Environmental and Climate Technologies
IS - 1
ER -