Activismo o garantismo en el proceso contencioso administrativo colombiano

Fernando Martínez Ureña, Dimaro Alexis Agudelo Mejía

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

In procedural law, the role that the judge must play in the trial is discussed. On the one hand, an active judge; on the other, a guarantor judge who leaves the leading role to the parties, considering that in this way equality and impartiality materialize. For this reason, it was formulated as a research problem: What is the procedural system and the concept of purpose of the process that defines the role of the judge in the Colombian contentious-administrative process? It is proposed to analyze, from within the procedural institutions, the charges and duties of the judge and the parties, based on the hypothesis that there are no boundaries that allow the precise definition of the nature of the procedural system and the concept of purpose of the process to which the judge must attend to exercise his function. To this end, an exploratory-analytical study of the applicable standards was carried out. The result of such analysis is that the role of the judge in the contentious-administrative process is not defined by the procedural system or the concepts of the purpose of the process, but is due to the legal nature of the claim or means of control.

Título traducido de la contribuciónACTIVISM OR GUARANTEE IN THE COLOMBIAN ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENTIOUS PROCESS
Idioma originalPortugués
Número de artículoe2328
PublicaciónRevista Direito GV
Volumen19
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 2023

Palabras clave

  • claim
  • contentious administrative jurisdiction
  • means of control
  • Procedural system
  • purpose of the process

Tipos de productos de Minciencias

  • Artículo A2 - Q2

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Activismo o garantismo en el proceso contencioso administrativo colombiano'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto