Argumentation of the trial rule or assessment of the test in oral systems

  • Pabón Giraldo, Liliana Damaris (PI)
  • ARROYAVE RESTREPO, EDUARDO (CoI)
  • JIMÉNEZ OSPINA, ALEJANDRO (CoI)
  • PEREA CUESTA, HELVER (CoI)
  • RAMOS GIL, DANIELA (CoI)
  • RUIZ MEJÍA, ISABEL CRISTINA (CoI)
  • VÁSQUEZ ARRIETA, YURANI (CoI)
  • ROJAS GONZÁLEZ, EDWIN ANMANYER (Research Assistant (Master's Student))
  • Flórez Pérez, John Alexander (Research Assistant (Master's Student))
  • Ramírez Jaramillo, Luis Fernando (Research Assistant (Master's Student))
  • Roldán Espinal, Violed Soleyde (Research Assistant (Master's Student))

Project Details

Description

Our procedural system now has another tendency, we are moving from a clearly written system to a system based on orality

Objective

Analyze the manner in which the jurisdictional official should argue the trial rule or assessment of the evidence in the oral systems.

Expected results

Analysis of the legal argumentation in relation to the judgment rule or assessment of the evidence made by the judicial officer.
StatusFinished
Effective start/end date1/06/091/11/10

Fingerprint

Explore the research topics touched on by this project. These labels are generated based on the underlying awards/grants. Together they form a unique fingerprint.